At the first glance of project 3, I thought it was easy, since I focused on the word autobiography, which means no more researching, no more information sorting. Until I read the “Who I am” articles striving for distinguishing the difference between storytelling and narrative describing than I realized I should help myself get rid of the previous storytelling style, because I am writing a paper in college level rather than just a memorial diary.
Listing all the memorable technology items or technical moments is another tortuous process, since I do have pounds of item, but the memories with them are either break into several parts or unworthy of mention. So, after I struggled out the particular items I want to write, I concentrated on plot setting and characteristic building though it’s not a pure story or drama. From the perspective of clearness and literacy profound, indicating deep meaning of technology literacy in wordless acting or characters behavior became the main goal to achieve.
Then came draft composing, it didn’t seem so harsh for me, but after the peer review, which I got two completely different point of view, I was lost. I thought if there wasn’t any vague presentation, this kind of situation wouldn’t appear. So, there must be some serious problem or some details I didn’t represent and explain well, which only resulted in this.
Revisited my essay, I did find some troubles which are made by unconsiderate and thoughtless. Currently, I am still revising some part of my essay, hope it will end great!